Hockey Pool

2009 Standings

Position	Name	Points	Weighting Remaining	Winning %
1	Amhlaoibh	567	91	29.62
2	Patrick	560	91	13.76
3	BrianH	557	88	0
4	Kirk	553	83	0.44
5	Derek	552	85	3.84
6	Jeffrey	547	86	2.23
7	BrianD	541	85	0.05
8	DavidS	539	88	0.63
9	Mike	538	84	1.83
10	Jasprit	537	84	1.17
11	Grady	537	80	0.32
12	Trevor	535	90	11.10
13	Seeds	532	79	n/a
14	Roel	528	92	8.64
15	Chris	528	80	0
16	Bill	527	90	2.27
17	George	526	82	0.30

2009 Standings (Cont.)

Position	Name	Points	Weighting Remaining	Winning %
18	Jon	526	78	0
19	MarkDC	526	77	0
20	Scott	524	90	4.83
21	Sarah	523	81	0.02
22	Ajay	521	87	3.16
23	MarkE	521	79	0.00
24	Jon	520	85	11.98
25	George	520	78	0
26	Trevor	516	80	0
27	DavidB	513	83	0
28	Kirk	507	79	0
29	Jaeslyn	498	85	3.73
30	Craig	495	75	0
31	Nathalie	489	66	0
32	Darby	483	74	0
33	Erin	476	70	0.08
34	Suzanne	468	67	0

2009 Results

Rank	Team	Wins

1	Bos	5
1	Det	5
1	Van	5
1	Was	5
5	Ana	4
5	Car	4
5	Chi	4
5	Pit	4
9	x-NJ	3
9	x-NYR	3
11	x-Cal	2
11	x-Phi	2
11	x-SJ	2
14	x-Clb	0
14	x-Mon	0
14	x-StL	0

x-Eliminated

Previous Standings

April 29, 10am April 28, 10pm April 28, 10am April 28, 1am April 27, 10am April 26, 10am April 25, 6pm April 24, 10pm April 24, 10am April 23, 10am April 22, 10am April 21, 10am April 20, 10am April 19, 10am April 18, 10am April 17, 10am April 16, 10am

Amhlaoibh retakes the lead and picks up about 5% in his winning percentage, as all the higher seeds win their second-round openers...also, Roel moves up five positions, comfortably into the top half; I held off previously on pointing out that he actually has the largest total weighting remaining of anyone, despite placing in the bottom half at the end of the first round and only going 6-for-8 (missing Anaheim and Vancouver, the same teams that tripped up the 7-for-8ers) thanks to wisely ranking the two teams he missed in the 9 and 10 slots...that distinction has resulted in him having the fifth-best winning percentage (after the leaders Amhlaoibh and Patrick, and Jon and me who are dependent on underdogs Chicago and Pittsburgh respectively)...the changes to the scoring have presumably made the weighting remaining more important than in years past...